there is a fine line between glamor and value - glamor appears to be valuable and value depends on the belief that it is so. the more value you place on an internal state of being the less glamor external factors may have - they become neutralised to simply hold the value of the observer free from marketing by the paradigm that created its appeal. This is where trade-off exists in its most fundamental form - 2+2=4 - if that is granted all else will follow (G.O. 1984). However if you a good capitalist the equation will ring false for 2 + 2 and a bit of glamor surely = a bit more than 4 or 5 even... the difference may be between a process and a product and which of those you value most. However a product bring experience so it may be where in the chain of creation you feel most valuable for surely that place would have the most glamor associated to it - no matter how much you have neutralised it - the marriage between value and glamor may be found in the emotional response you capable of having due to the factors surrounding you combining in their very unique way - if you value emotion that is
The less attention external forces receive the quieter they seem to be - when no external force, object or state can be connected to the state you experience in "being" you simply interacting with the internal state - maybe a clearer force to try and understand or humor for that matter
then again probably not
